Jump to content

Micky Mellon's Retained and Released List

LaticMark
 Share

Retain or Release?  

145 members have voted

  1. 1. Dan Langley

    • Retain
      21
    • Release
      124

  2. 2. Benny Couto

    • Retain
      31
    • Release
      114

  3. 3. Harrison McGahey

    • Retain
      12
    • Release
      133

  4. 4. Brennan Dickenson

    • Retain
      10
    • Release
      135

  5. 5. Dan Gardner

    • Retain
      42
    • Release
      103

  6. 6. Devarn Green

    • Retain
      70
    • Release
      75

  7. 7. Ben Tollitt

    • Retain
      7
    • Release
      138

  8. 8. Jordan Windass

    • Retain
      3
    • Release
      142

  9. 9. Mike Fondop

    • Retain
      78
    • Release
      67

  10. 10. Hallam Hope

    • Retain
      23
    • Release
      122

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/24/2024 at 12:55 PM

Recommended Posts

oafc1955 David Eyres

oafc1955

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LaticMark said:

 

We also need to get Nuttall off the wage bill as well. He's supposed to be the club's 2nd biggest earner! Dickenson is the highest earner who's out of contract according to Salary Sport. Those 3 would 'save' around £6,700 a week if their figures are anywhere near correct!

Think it would save way more than that, Norwood is reputed to be on £5k alone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 528
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Handsy
Handsy

Total over the top pissboil on here and X .  What do we have 19 contracted players  atm  not a big enough squad for a full season I think we can all agree on that. So we need another 5 or 6 players fo

GlossopLatic
GlossopLatic

Heeee heeeee!

OAFC_ULTRA
OAFC_ULTRA

Ah, so a senior coach was there to report back to MM. Yes that will do

oafc1955 David Eyres

oafc1955

Posted
Posted

I also believe that going forward contracts for any new signings should be for no more than 1 year with an option. That would then give the club a fail safe whilst encouraging the said players to perform consistently rather than sat on their underperforming arses for 2 or more years thus leaving the club stuck in a financial nightmare!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nzlatic Rick Holden

nzlatic

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

I also believe that going forward contracts for any new signings should be for no more than 1 year with an option. That would then give the club a fail safe whilst encouraging the said players to perform consistently rather than sat on their underperforming arses for 2 or more years thus leaving the club stuck in a financial nightmare!

We could have someone taken off us after 1 season if they’ve been really good though and we’d get nothing. Plus only offering those sort of deals could mean we lose out on targets. 
 

It’s a difficult thing to get right - long contracts for the great signings, short contracts for the shit ones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oafc1955 David Eyres

oafc1955

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, nzlatic said:

It’s a difficult thing to get right - long contracts for the great signings, short contracts for the shit ones. 

Options enable you to monitor progress so if a player is performing admirably you can take up the option fairly early.
Are you clairvoyant or summat?😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nzlatic Rick Holden

nzlatic

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

Options enable you to monitor progress so if a player is performing admirably you can take up the option fairly early.
Are you clairvoyant or summat?😂😂

Could they refuse though if someone else is sniffing? Not really sure how options work. 
 

Maybe statsbomb has a suggested contract length feature and we should just go with whatever that says?!

Edited by nzlatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oafc1955 David Eyres

oafc1955

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, nzlatic said:

Could they refuse though if someone else is sniffing? Not really sure how options work. 

It has to be better than the pile of shite the vast majority, if not all of our signings have left us in!!😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mick26 Earl Barrett

mick26

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, nzlatic said:

Could they refuse though if someone else is sniffing? Not really sure how options work. 
 

Maybe statsbomb has a suggested contract length feature and we should just go with whatever that says?!

If the club has an option then I'm sure they can activate it - only means another year though so a player who wants out can just see that out unless a new longer deal is agreed.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crusoe Rick Holden

Crusoe

Posted
Posted

It’s also not a one-sided thing. Players will have their own demands for contract length. If they’re (genuinely) good enough that we want them, they likely have other clubs interested too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dave_Og John Sheridan

Dave_Og

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, GKing521 said:

Nuttall 3,000 a week and has a yearly increase bolted in.

 

Other duds have increases bolted into their deals as well. It’s one of the main reasons MM has been so down. 

 

And someone with his experience didn't know this before he took over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LightDN123 Rick Holden

LightDN123

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, GKing521 said:

Nuttall 3,000 a week and has a yearly increase bolted in.

 

Other duds have increases bolted into their deals as well. It’s one of the main reasons MM has been so down. 

 

Not doubting you, but what’s your source ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oafc1955 David Eyres

oafc1955

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

You aren't getting game changers on one year contracts so let's put that red herring back in the sea.

But you can get duck eggs on 2 year deals!!😆

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Littlemoor Lad Rick Holden

Littlemoor Lad

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

You aren't getting game changers on one year contracts so let's put that red herring back in the sea.

We should have had bigger escape holes in the nets, the last time we went trawling

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BP1960 Andy Ritchie

BP1960

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, oafc1955 said:

I also believe that going forward contracts for any new signings should be for no more than 1 year with an option. That would then give the club a fail safe whilst encouraging the said players to perform consistently rather than sat on their underperforming arses for 2 or more years thus leaving the club stuck in a financial nightmare!

 

Does that include the manager?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BP1960 Andy Ritchie

BP1960

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Littlemoor Lad said:

We should have had bigger escape holes in the nets, the last time we went trawling

 

You can get game changers on loan, we've had them in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BradKnowles1 Danny Boshell

BradKnowles1

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

McGahey must be a stone cold psycho/glutton for punishment, why else would you want to stay at a place you have been abused for three years...?

This is very true. Hes taken some pelters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...