oafc1955 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 What did Moiseley say? He did say the potential investors would have no say in the next managers appointment incase the deal didn't go through. If that statement is true and not bullshit there is no way a new manager is going to come here under those circumstances, and especially one who is currently in a job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozman Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, oafc1955 said: What did Moiseley say? He did say the potential investors would have no say in the next managers appointment incase the deal didn't go through. If that statement is true and not bullshit there is no way a new manager is going to come here under those circumstances, and especially one who is currently in a job. That's definitely what he said. Whether or not that's true is another matter. As others have alluded to, if that were true, why wouldn't the principle extend to the players we've signed that the previous manager apparently wasn't keen on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmer1 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 1 hour ago, HarryBosch said: Why is Ferguson's ability at improving sides relevant but Correa's isn't? I didnt say it was irrelevant. I said he was unknown. He's never managed in England and may not speak the language fluency. All relevant... What is his record improving sides managed at our level in whatever country? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, bozman said: That's definitely what he said. Whether or not that's true is another matter. As others have alluded to, if that were true, why wouldn't the principle extend to the players we've signed that the previous manager apparently wasn't keen on? Not sure of the point you are making here? Edited September 26, 2017 by oafc1955 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickjagger Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 8 minutes ago, bozman said: That's definitely what he said. Whether or not that's true is another matter. As others have alluded to, if that were true, why wouldn't the principle extend to the players we've signed that the previous manager apparently wasn't keen on? Does not ring true Who has funded the influx of players? Who will be funding the reserve side? Why has Correa already been to matches allegedly? Of course they will have a say in the next manager otherwise we will appoint a temporary manager until the investment/takeover is finalised which could take some time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozman Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, oafc1955 said: Not sure of the point you are making here? I wa confirming that was definitely what Moisley said in the interview but suggesting that it probably isn't true. That's not to say, Moisley is trying to mislead the fans. I don't think he knows much more about the takeover/invetstment situation than the rest of us do. He probably said that because it felt like the right thing to say from the club's perspective in the absence of him knowing for certain that it isn't true. I agree with you completely that the prospect of another permanant manager coming in (other than an Abdallah approved candidtate) before this saga is sorted one way or the other is virtually nill. Clearly Abdallah has influenced the signings of recent weeks so it's reasonable to assume he will also influence any permanant managerial appointment that is made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 32 minutes ago, oafc1955 said: What did Moiseley say? He did say the potential investors would have no say in the next managers appointment incase the deal didn't go through. If that statement is true and not bullshit there is no way a new manager is going to come here under those circumstances, and especially one who is currently in a job. I hope it is bullshit because they should if a deal is so close... With them about to invest significantly in, or take over, the club & being aware of their pool of contacts/knowledge (a different one to yours) you'd tap them up for a few suggestions wouldn't you....? Not to mention consult with them & keep them in the loop as to who you're thinking of appointing in order to not jeopardise the deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 7 minutes ago, bozman said: I wa confirming that was definitely what Moisley said in the interview but suggesting that it probably isn't true. That's not to say, Moisley is trying to mislead the fans. I don't think he knows much more about the takeover/invetstment situation than the rest of us do. He probably said that because it felt like the right thing to say from the club's perspective in the absence of him knowing for certain that it isn't true. "The deal's close now so, yes, we'll consult with them and keep them in the loop. We'll even invite suggestions from them & tap into their pool of contacts. We'd be daft not to. That said, until the deal is complete, and while Simon still owns the club, he'll be making the final decision" would have been more like the right thing to say. Not to mention probably true, I hope.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I suspect if AL suggested the interview panel come dressed as Power Rangers the idea would be given due consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Are people honestly believing Moiseley when he says that the new investors will not be influencing the appointment of the new manager? Not only will Lemsagam and whatever consortium he is part of be picking it they will have probably influenced Sheridan's departure. Its most likely be Wellens and TP will be given first team duties until the takeover is complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 17 minutes ago, GlossopLatic said: Are people honestly believing Moiseley when he says that the new investors will not be influencing the appointment of the new manager? Not only will Lemsagam and whatever consortium he is part of be picking it they will have probably influenced Sheridan's departure. Its most likely be Wellens and TP will be given first team duties until the takeover is complete. Of course but imagine the fuss if he'd come out and said the truth. They can't do right for doing wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boundaryblue80 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, deyres42 said: Of course but imagine the fuss if he'd come out and said the truth. They can't do right for doing wrong. How about, from the very beginning, not allowing an outside source to heavily influence the running of the club until they actually own part/most of it. This deal might collapse. Yet it’s seen us take on unwanted players & create a terribly unsettling atmosphere that’s assisted in poor results and influencing the sacking of a manager. Absolute fucking circus this. And doesn’t look like it’s stopping for some time yet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozman Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 57 minutes ago, HarryBosch said: "The deal's close now so, yes, we'll consult with them and keep them in the loop. We'll even invite suggestions from them & tap into their pool of contacts. We'd be daft not to. That said, until the deal is complete, and while Simon still owns the club, he'll be making the final decision" would have been more like the right thing to say. Not to mention probably true, I hope.... Let's hope that is pretty close to the truth, but I wouldn't expect Moisley to say something like that unless 1) He's been told that 2) He's been told he can say that in public. From what I've heard, it's unlikely he's been told either of those things. I don't think in any of the radio/press interviews he's done since the story broke, Moisley has said anything of note that Corney hadn't already revealed in his video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, boundaryblue80 said: How about, from the very beginning, not allowing an outside source to heavily influence the running of the club until they actually own part/most of it. This deal might collapse. Yet it’s seen us take on unwanted players & create a terribly unsettling atmosphere that’s assisted in poor results and influencing the sacking of a manager. Absolute fucking circus this. And doesn’t look like it’s stopping for some time yet! Corney pretty much said in last video that the tank was empty in terms of further funding - one can speculate on how much that amounts to, don't think we need another Corney is a twat thread though. Very unsettling though, we can agree on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UsedtobeWozzer Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I see today’s market mover is Alan Stubbs in to 5/1. Didn’t last long at Rovrum but decent job at Hibs from what I recall. Might help sort the defence out too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Alan Stubbs attracting money. 5/1 available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Ian Evatt is 25/1 Training would be interesting for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 41 minutes ago, oafcmetty said: Alan Stubbs attracting money. 5/1 available. Went to 9/2 20 minutes ago and now he's 4/1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 https://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/oldham/next-permanent-manager According to this link Dean Holden is now the most backed candidate I'm slowly losing the will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) Shez is 25/1 for Gillingham job. Just behind Walter Zenga, ubt same odds as Dean Holden.... Edited September 26, 2017 by singe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneSizeFitz Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 1 hour ago, UsedtobeWozzer said: I see today’s market mover is Alan Stubbs in to 5/1. Didn’t last long at Rovrum but decent job at Hibs from what I recall. Might help sort the defence out too. Wouldn't be so sure... He lasted 14 games at Rotherham, winning 1, and conceding 37... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneSizeFitz Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 56 minutes ago, singe said: Shez is 25/1 for Gillingham job. Just behind Walter Zenga, ubt same odds as Dean Holden.... I reckon he'll turn up at Bury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mick26 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Sky sports "Oldham implementing Rooney rule and one of four interviewees is BAME" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robboman Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Darren Way: http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/09/25/por-way-in-frame-for-oldham-job/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 9 minutes ago, robboman said: Darren Way: http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/09/25/por-way-in-frame-for-oldham-job/ No way. Sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.