Monty Burns Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Nah he defo had it, just he had access to a helicopter, an army base, all the top doctors and all the top treatments. That's why the orange prick could come out and carry on w his bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 On 11/12/2020 at 4:48 PM, Dave_Og said: Who's confident that the vaccine, if approved, will be rolled out efficiently? Mu partner, recently retired nurse of 35 years standing, been asked to come out of retirement and pay £195 to be included in the pool of available staff. Great plan... Meanwhile my mate's 86 year old Mum has had the same offer. My mum's offer (she's 88) must be in the post. Will all depend on how much parliament can change it's legislation. There was a public consultation about it in mid-September. Essentially without that change in legislation only doctors (effectively only GPs) can give the vaccine initially as it won't have been deemed safe officially at that stage. Giving a vaccine is relatively easy and the governments proposed change didn't go far enough IMHO as only regulated and registered health care workers could give it with the change. That excluded thousands of other potential vaccinators who could easily do it, because they've already got the skills. Without the change in legislation it will take a very, very long time to complete the vaccination programme. The keeping the vaccine at - 70°C will also be a significant problem. I don't think every hospital, nevermind GP practices, have the facilities to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 6 hours ago, rudemedic said: Will all depend on how much parliament can change it's legislation. There was a public consultation about it in mid-September. Essentially without that change in legislation only doctors (effectively only GPs) can give the vaccine initially as it won't have been deemed safe officially at that stage. Giving a vaccine is relatively easy and the governments proposed change didn't go far enough IMHO as only regulated and registered health care workers could give it with the change. That excluded thousands of other potential vaccinators who could easily do it, because they've already got the skills. Without the change in legislation it will take a very, very long time to complete the vaccination programme. The keeping the vaccine at - 70°C will also be a significant problem. I don't think every hospital, nevermind GP practices, have the facilities to do that. My partner's offer was to pay to attend sessions where she could then be authorised to train others to give the vaccine. They are mad if they think significant numbers of suitable health professionals will take up that offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 41 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: They are mad Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobledgersheart Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 13 hours ago, rudemedic said: The keeping the vaccine at - 70°C will also be a significant problem. I don't think every hospital, nevermind GP practices, have the facilities to do that. They've said it can be transported in dry ice and then would keep 3 or 4 days at normal fridge temperatures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 14 hours ago, rudemedic said: Will all depend on how much parliament can change it's legislation. There was a public consultation about it in mid-September. Essentially without that change in legislation only doctors (effectively only GPs) can give the vaccine initially as it won't have been deemed safe officially at that stage. Giving a vaccine is relatively easy and the governments proposed change didn't go far enough IMHO as only regulated and registered health care workers could give it with the change. That excluded thousands of other potential vaccinators who could easily do it, because they've already got the skills. Without the change in legislation it will take a very, very long time to complete the vaccination programme. The keeping the vaccine at - 70°C will also be a significant problem. I don't think every hospital, nevermind GP practices, have the facilities to do that. They are talking about setting up walk in areas and also going to a pharmacy, like the flu jab, except you won't have to pay. It will take a long time, and only covers people over 50 for now as I understand it, because we have only purchased enough for 20 million people. The Oxford vaccine should also be available soon if everything has gone well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, al_bro said: They are talking about setting up walk in areas and also going to a pharmacy, like the flu jab, except you won't have to pay. It will take a long time, and only covers people over 50 for now as I understand it, because we have only purchased enough for 20 million people. The Oxford vaccine should also be available soon if everything has gone well. Some jabs, yellow fever is one, require specific qualifications to give. I've no idea if this is one but the fact they are asking for people to be trained to do so suggest it might be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: Some jabs, yellow fever is one, require specific qualifications to give. I've no idea if this is one but the fact they are asking for people to be trained to do so suggest it might be. Is that the one you get at the bottom of the back which shoots down the sciatic nerve. It was very uncomfortable if that was the one had before going to Bali. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 39 minutes ago, al_bro said: Is that the one you get at the bottom of the back which shoots down the sciatic nerve. It was very uncomfortable if that was the one had before going to Bali. you know more than me! I know it was a two day course for my pet nurse to be qualified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidge Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 5 hours ago, al_bro said: Is that the one you get at the bottom of the back which shoots down the sciatic nerve. It was very uncomfortable if that was the one had before going to Bali. Yes if you are given it in the wrong place, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidge Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 5 hours ago, Dave_Og said: Some jabs, yellow fever is one, require specific qualifications to give. I've no idea if this is one but the fact they are asking for people to be trained to do so suggest it might be. It is possible that if it only has an emergency licence, that it will have to be given by a doctor. It may require special legislation to be given by a pharmacist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frizzell54 Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 On 11/14/2020 at 12:09 AM, rudemedic said: The keeping the vaccine at - 70°C will also be a significant problem. I don't think every hospital, nevermind GP practices, have the facilities to do that. Most routine hospital blood banks will have storage down to -30 degrees C to store Fresh Frozen Plasma. I do not know about pharmacy department requirements. Minus 70 is a big ask, no doubt there will be some venture capitalist operating from their front room willing to supply kit at great cost. 19 hours ago, al_bro said: Is that the one you get at the bottom of the back which shoots down the sciatic nerve. It was very uncomfortable if that was the one had before going to Bali. No it's the one that makes you feel you've been hit by a bus for about a week (cytokines and all that). If you're over 60 and if you are still alive after about 2 weeks you should be ok . It does last for life though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanuts2 Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 8 hours ago, frizzell54 said: Most routine hospital blood banks will have storage down to -30 degrees C to store Fresh Frozen Plasma. I do not know about pharmacy department requirements. Minus 70 is a big ask, no doubt there will be some venture capitalist operating from their front room willing to supply kit at great cost. No it's the one that makes you feel you've been hit by a bus for about a week (cytokines and all that). If you're over 60 and if you are still alive after about 2 weeks you should be ok . It does last for life though in one of my previous jobs we had to occasionally had to run volatile chemicals from Manchester uni to Southampton for disposal .finding a freezer van that could stay below -25% to keep it stable was a bind not saying it can't be done but its going to be a logistics nightmare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 23 hours ago, peanuts2 said: in one of my previous jobs we had to occasionally had to run volatile chemicals from Manchester uni to Southampton for disposal .finding a freezer van that could stay below -25% to keep it stable was a bind not saying it can't be done but its going to be a logistics nightmare The boxes the vaccine is transported in are supposed to keep them at the correct temperature using dry ice. They aren't very big boxes, so can be kept in surgeries and once removed can be kept in their fridges for a few days.. However a GP on TV today, said surgery fridges would have to be emptied of vaccines and other medications, in order to store enough of these vaccines. Either that or buy more fridges. I guess this situation arises with any vaccine required for the virus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidge Posted November 18, 2020 Share Posted November 18, 2020 On 11/16/2020 at 6:22 PM, al_bro said: The boxes the vaccine is transported in are supposed to keep them at the correct temperature using dry ice. They aren't very big boxes, so can be kept in surgeries and once removed can be kept in their fridges for a few days.. However a GP on TV today, said surgery fridges would have to be emptied of vaccines and other medications, in order to store enough of these vaccines. Either that or buy more fridges. I guess this situation arises with any vaccine required for the virus. I don’t think these vaccines will take so much fridge space, and new fridges have been funded this year for the flu campaign. The vaccine in rumoured to come in 5 dose vials. Flu vaccines are individual ready made up syringes and hence take up considerably more space. Flu vaccines are mostly given already, so GPs fridges should have room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Some potential for fans to be back at games soon. Not in pox-ridden Oldham though, most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 29 minutes ago, oafcmetty said: Some potential for fans to be back at games soon. Not in pox-ridden Oldham though, most likely. Could be for the last 14 games. Starting against Bolton on March 2nd. perhaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Apparently the highest infection rates are in schoolchildren and young adults, what the fuck did this inept government think was going to happen once they opened the schools and university halls of residence. And the cost of this most probably means more small retail outlets and licensed premises going out of business. Matt fucking Hancock we would have been better off with Tony Hancock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 32 minutes ago, disjointed said: Apparently the highest infection rates are in schoolchildren and young adults, what the fuck did this inept government think was going to happen once they opened the schools and university halls of residence. And the cost of this most probably means more small retail outlets and licensed premises going out of business. Matt fucking Hancock we would have been better off with Tony Hancock. Or Nick Hancock. So, frigging great lumps of the country will be in tier 3, but it all changes for 5 days at Christmas. Then what? Oh, of course, get ready for the third spike. What brilliant thinking by Bumbling Boris and his equally bumbling cabinet. Obviously, the scientists (who's advice they said they would always follow), know sweet sod all. If they'd listened to previous advice, like they said they had (but didn't), we could be in a much better position now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 11 minutes ago, Bristolatic said: Or Nick Hancock. So, frigging great lumps of the country will be in tier 3, but it all changes for 5 days at Christmas. Then what? Oh, of course, get ready for the third spike. What brilliant thinking by Bumbling Boris and his equally bumbling cabinet. Obviously, the scientists (who's advice they said they would always follow), know sweet sod all. If they'd listened to previous advice, like they said they had (but didn't), we could be in a much better position now. Exactly this 5 day Xmas thing is laughable, what do they think is going to happen, only 3 families my arse, it will be a free for all. Either do this properly or let people just get on with it, half baked half arsed ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 7 minutes ago, Bristolatic said: Or Nick Hancock. So, frigging great lumps of the country will be in tier 3, but it all changes for 5 days at Christmas. Then what? Oh, of course, get ready for the third spike. What brilliant thinking by Bumbling Boris and his equally bumbling cabinet. Obviously, the scientists (who's advice they said they would always follow), know sweet sod all. 7 minutes ago, Bristolatic said: If they'd listened to previous advice, like they said they had (but didn't), we could be in a much better position now. It was a scientist, or the chief medical officer (can't remember which) who said that someone with covid attending a football match would only infect the people sat around them. Totally ignoring travelling to and from the ground, queueing up to get in, going to the toilets, going to the bar and getting something to eat. As far as Christmas goes, I expect most people will use their common sense and not travel around to visit vulnerable people. Why risk it when the end is so close, after nearly a full year of isolating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TamarBridgeLatics Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Well the initial joy of being placed in tier 1 and being able to visit the characters in the Bull's Head without the need of a "substantial meal" is slowly wearing off. Undoubtedly hordes of people will descend on the place now, possibly throwing us into a higher tier around christmas. Undoubtedly some will complain about how unfriendly the locals are, but we might have to suffer the consequences once they've left. The tamar bridge will certainly be busy in the next few weeks with travellers from Plymouth alone as they're in tier 2. The Royal Albert Bridge Inn (RABI) by the riverside in Plymouth serving drink with food only, or across the river you're free to drink in Saltash at the Railway or Brunel? Decisions, decisions. We were concerned that we would be included with Bristol due to them incorporating the whole of the south west from Somerset down to Dorset and Penzance but as always they work in mysterious ways. Much too complicated for us plebs. I do wonder about the sense of it all when over 60's such as me are being shielded yet a 23 year old and a 31 year old have now been told that they're terminally ill with cancer after their diagnoses were delayed due to the virus. So in the meantime we'll enjoy the lesser restrictions and be as careful as we have been and see what evolves as there's sod all that we can do about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 The fat slob is saying we cannot ease off now. He should add the caveat "but for 5 days over Xmas, fucking go for it". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TamarBridgeLatics Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Behind Closed Doors Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Any mathematicians on here? in Liverpool over the last 2 weeks they have tested circa 200k.....one of the benefits is that they say they have found 800 asymptomatic positives . My O level Maths tells me that is 400 per 100k even without symptomatic positives . How is it possible that the official figure for Liverpool is 147 per 100k for 15th Nov to 22nd Nov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.