Jump to content

Club statement HMRC raid


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, singe said:

Magister posted at 4.49pm the specific number.

IIRC The Mike Keegan Daily Mail posted at 4.38pm, but that article did not include a number of officers initially, it was revised to state 15 officers at 17.12, I think on the back of the Magister comment or at least the same source.

 

 

But the article did include computers being taken away. Which Moisley states is untrue. The actual number of officers isn’t that important when the original article states SFO turned up but the club have denied that any did at all. All of that in the Mail posted before anyone posted on OWTB. Just saying. 

 

 

Edited by boundaryblue80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, leeslover said:

Do they even take computers away these days? Surely you would put a memory stick in and copy what you wanted.

That's a good point and although I am no expert, I would imagine the computers [most probably the majority are laptops] would be taken so that any deleted or shredded information might possibly be recovered...if necessary, that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, leeslover said:

Do they even take computers away these days? Surely you would put a memory stick in and copy what you wanted.

 

The original format/copies are needed in criminal investigations to ensure transperancy that nothing has been altered and to prove that any material did actually come from that source. Chain of custody - I imagine it’s the same with these investigations too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Crusoe said:

Both right. You try to recover data that others have tried to hide or delete, and you need to prove that you didn't tamper with the data while hunting for it. Did this for a bit many years ago, it's interesting stuff (well, if you're into that sort of thing).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_forensics

 

 

Could be a defence for Mr Tulsehill over the work porn allegations then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, boundaryblue80 said:

 

But the article did include computers being taken away. Which Moisley states is untrue. The actual number of officers isn’t that important when the original article states SFO turned up but the club have denied that any did at all. All of that in the Mail posted before anyone posted on OWTB. Just saying. 

 

 

Yeah, Magister's info was very spefidic giving it credence, and the Daily Mail article backed it up.

I can see the minutae of the denial but I think the intent is clear to deny what is reported occured.

Time may tell, but it may be a long time, if ever. Not much sign from Newcastle or West Ham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
Just now, LaticsPete said:

Why show apparent glee?  

I hope now this finally shows the truth of the glaring problems behind the scenes at #oafc so we can finally rally around one common goal. Rather than ignoring and hiding away from it and pretending everything is ok. There's no happiness at all, our football club could very well go under and you've got people calling others 'virgins' for predicting a finish of 22nd. Starting on minus points is looking likely... if we even get there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...