Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

She came back for more plenty times....

 

I am sorry i thought this was men talking about football and other items or have i stumbled into a women's federation group?

 

to quote Richard Keys "he definitely smashed her"

Barry...? Is that you...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete - Report it, I don't see anything that would be considered too far (there's a lot of horse:censored:, but removing that would leave this place empty)

 

Believable? In a sense, yes. I believe you've watched porn this morning, possibly while sitting at the back of your BTEC business class.

Don't feed the troll, 24hrs, he'll just Post more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


Believable? In a sense, yes. I believe you've watched porn this morning, possibly while sitting at the back of your BTEC business class.



BTEC is that new form of car engine?

 

 


I'm hoping to find out the #seatnumber later on in the exchanges.



Why would you require my seat number, when you can have my longitude and lattitude?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we still didn't offer him the deal.

 

He owes us nothing.

Um, the deal was offered, agreed and signed.

 

Just like it was at Sheffield United.

 

But in both cases a delay in announcing it, both clubs naively thinking the storm would blow over or could be tackled, proved its undoing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, the deal was offered, agreed and signed.

What deal?

 

He doesn't play for us.

 

He doesn't owe us anything if we shat out of the deal. Is what I was saying. We're just like every other club who wouldn't touch him.

 

We didn't back him when he wanted and needed it the most, so why would he swan back to us if his conviction is overturned?

 

Especially if he has better offers.

 

[i'm posting this from Evan's perspective, not my perspective on whether we should have signed him or not]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye true. But I got impression from the press that they (Camp Evans and his missus' dad) were more angry with Sheff U. The dad reportedly warned and pleaded that they just had go public with the deal as soon as he came out of prison - but the club delayed thinking criticism would wane... With us it was more of an expected deja view. You're right that he doesn't owe us anything, but he may well have admired the club's determination (more than Sheff U) to get the deal over the line. Not that that will necessarily lead to anything though...!

Edited by IceStationLatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a guilty man, released from prison, he's entitled to seek employment.

 

Employers have the right to employ him too. Equally, they have the choice to not employ him.

 

Latics were stupid to try and employ him. They'd already seen the Sheffield Utd circus unfold.

 

If the system eventually clears him then I would have no problem with Latics signing him. Although it's fairly obvious a better paying employer will be found.

 

As an innocent man there would still be a number of moral question marks against his character. But I don't think they should make him any less employable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot on. And they shouldn't.

 

But it was/is/will be a unique toxic association with Evans in the modern social media age, which their camp predicted and knew Sheff U acting quickly was the only chance of tackling.

 

Even if he is cleared, he may struggle because of the history and 'circus' around him - unlike other footballers, guilty of crimes, who still play today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Saudi millionaire cleared of raping teenager after telling court he may have accidentally penetrated 18-year-old when he tripped and fell on her

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3361640/Saudi-millionaire-cleared-raping-teenager-telling-court-accidentally-penetrated-18-year-old-tripped-fell-her.html

 

Apparently it is possible....I'm shocked that this is an English court given the headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...