leeslover Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Is that true? Can you even contract and sell an 11-year-old? They aren't worth much at that age, getting too big to fit up the chimney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Most deals? Name 5 not including Richards we may have settled for 10% for more cash up front. Didnt Bury have 10% on Chris Armstrong or Dale Stephens? Fleetwood get 25% for Vardy for starters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hometownclub Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 As decent a player as he is, the thing that struck with me while watching Tarkowski was an alarming lack of any pace. I remember Glenn Murray coming to BP with Brighton and giving him a 2 yard start over about 20 yards and beating him hands down. I know he has plenty more to his game than that, it just really stuck with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 As decent a player as he is, the thing that struck with me while watching Tarkowski was an alarming lack of any pace. I remember Glenn Murray coming to BP with Brighton and giving him a 2 yard start over about 20 yards and beating him hands down. I know he has plenty more to his game than that, it just really stuck with me. They used to say that about Bobby Moore, but he did ok at top level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hometownclub Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 They used to say that about Bobby Moore, but he did ok at top level. True, he is still a good player, but that really surprised me as Glenn Murray is hardly renowned as a speed merchant and he left him for dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 (edited) True, he is still a good player, but that really surprised me as Glenn Murray is hardly renowned as a speed merchant and he left him for dead. Glenn Murray wouldn't leave him for dead now though Edited January 12, 2016 by BP1960 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hometownclub Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Glenn Murray wouldn't leave him for dead now though Has Glenn Murray lost some speed or has Tarkowski found some from somewhere? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 The sell on clause is 20%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticMark Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Maybe we settled for 10% for more money if they got promoted. From the Chron in February 20014: "Athletic says the fee for Tarkowski - officially undisclosed - is far more than the £150,000 reported in some papers last week. Part of the fee is thought to be dependent on Brentford moving up to the Championship. A sell-on clause has been incorporated, Lee Johnson has confirmed." http://www.oldham-chronicle.co.uk/news-features/10/oldham-athletic-news/84436/tarky-talks-over-latics-loan-return Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 They aren't worth much at that age, getting too big to fit up the chimney I'll cash in now then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmer1 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Fleetwood get 25% for Vardy for starters. thats not like 'most deals' then, 20%? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 thats not like 'most deals' then, 20%? It's the first relevant one I looked at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Sinnott Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Is that true? Can you even contract and sell an 11-year-old? The MEN also suggested it was 10% back in August. A mate of mine signed for City from Latics when he was 12 or 13. He signed in a double move with Micah Richards. We got some money for the pair of them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 A mate of mine signed for City from Latics when he was 12 or 13. He signed in a double move with Micah Richards. We got some money for the pair of them... What became of him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 With Dunn being sacked are we effectively counting this as a done deal. we must have found the cash to pay them off from somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowl Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 With Dunn being sacked are we effectively counting this as a done deal. we must have found the cash to pay them off from somewhere. Or just used the Philiskirk money... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 At least it suggests they wouldn't be happy with relegation but they need the right man this time....no fu***** about with rookies!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 What became of him? Everyone forgot all about Richards straight after his City move.... Barely a whisper since.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 The sell on clause is 20%. Source? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusoe Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 20% of fee or profit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyPimp Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 20% of fee or profit? Not much difference if we sold him on the cheap! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Sinnott Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 What became of him? Nothing of note. Played at Glossop and FC United. Don't think he plays at all anymore... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayItLivo Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Not much difference if we sold him on the cheap! There can be quite a difference. 20% of the fee would be a one off payment of 20% of how much Brentford sell him for. 20% of profit applies to any future profit Brentford make on him, (e.g. If they have a sell on clause with Burnley and Burnley sell Tarky to a bigger club in the future, we'll get 20% of the percentage of the sell on fee which Brentford get, and if that clause is also a percentage of profit, then if he again gets sold from that big club to another club, we'll get money from that too. That's how Rochdale and Stockport both got fees when Liverpool signed Rickie Lambert from Southampton, because Rochdale got a cut of Bristol Rovers' sell on fee which they negotiated when they sold him to Southampton, and then Stockport got a cut of what Rochdale received. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthonyOAFC Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 He's in Brentford's starting lineup tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Tarkowski played tonight, Brentford lost 1-0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.