SweeperKeeper Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 13 minutes ago, kowenicki said: If Leutwiler knows that the alternative is Laurie Walker, then he knows that he's got the club over a barrel when it comes to renegotiating his contract... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperKeeper Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 4 hours ago, UsedtobeWozzer said: Laurie Walker’s back! In between times, he finally made his league debut for MK Dons. Let three in of which two were clearly his fault. Didn't even make their bench for the matches after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyyou Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 McGahey supposedly signed a two-year deal, like Lutweiler. Must be in the same boat, rather than some mysterious six-week injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchierich Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 3 hours ago, kowenicki said: It’s not going well is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 47 minutes ago, Ritchierich said: It’s not going well is it? An "unfortunate misinterpretation". Incompetence is a better way to describe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latics22 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Ritchierich said: It’s not going well is it? So we’ll we’re four games In and he is no where near the field. So Jason u know that 2 year contract that pays well over £800 a week…. How about, you may laugh, u may say no, this is Oldham athletic before you make any snap decisions, I know I know you were warned…. Any how…. Can u do £800 a week, 1 year deal and we pinky promise another year with a top up. We honour top ups, give A call to David weat, i mean yeah we honour contracts and top ups….. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Ritchierich said: It’s not going well is it? Harrison McGahey is the other signing contracted until 2023. Have we unfortunately misinterpreted his contract too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryowen Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 The club statement represents negligence and mal-administration. Simple fact. The EFL Regulations can be complex but the one on embargo is a simple read. Even if you don’t understand it there is a Governance Department and a Solicitor at the EFL who can advise. In my opinion, the player still has his contract because the EFL regulation does not revoke it. We are told the club are supporting the player. Of course they are, he will be getting his wages in accordance with its terms. The “system” is simple. You don’t misunderstand interpretations with contracts which is costly if you get it wrong. The club solicitors was often the back stop when checking contracts before being finalised. I would be interested if they had an input. I just have an incline they haven’t because club staff would believe they know better. I hope an agreement is reached for the boy’s sake because he does not want to get himself into a position of not towing the line. Watch this space.!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 7 hours ago, Barryowen said: The club statement represents negligence and mal-administration. Simple fact. The EFL Regulations can be complex but the one on embargo is a simple read. Even if you don’t understand it there is a Governance Department and a Solicitor at the EFL who can advise. In my opinion, the player still has his contract because the EFL regulation does not revoke it. We are told the club are supporting the player. Of course they are, he will be getting his wages in accordance with its terms. The “system” is simple. You don’t misunderstand interpretations with contracts which is costly if you get it wrong. The club solicitors was often the back stop when checking contracts before being finalised. I would be interested if they had an input. I just have an incline they haven’t because club staff would believe they know better. I hope an agreement is reached for the boy’s sake because he does not want to get himself into a position of not towing the line. Watch this space.!!!!! While Rome burns springs to mind with this current administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mikey Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 8 hours ago, Barryowen said: The club statement represents negligence and mal-administration. Simple fact. The EFL Regulations can be complex but the one on embargo is a simple read. Even if you don’t understand it there is a Governance Department and a Solicitor at the EFL who can advise. In my opinion, the player still has his contract because the EFL regulation does not revoke it. We are told the club are supporting the player. Of course they are, he will be getting his wages in accordance with its terms. The “system” is simple. You don’t misunderstand interpretations with contracts which is costly if you get it wrong. The club solicitors was often the back stop when checking contracts before being finalised. I would be interested if they had an input. I just have an incline they haven’t because club staff would believe they know better. I hope an agreement is reached for the boy’s sake because he does not want to get himself into a position of not towing the line. Watch this space.!!!!! Is that the incline from the RRE to the Chaddy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie Down Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 Interesting article in this morning's Guardian on Derby County and their experience of the EFL embargo. Worth a look to view the practicalities of it all. Needless to say, Derby, for all their woes, appear to be open to shed light on their predicament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Sinnott2 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 10 hours ago, Barryowen said: The club statement represents negligence and mal-administration. Simple fact. The EFL Regulations can be complex but the one on embargo is a simple read. Even if you don’t understand it there is a Governance Department and a Solicitor at the EFL who can advise. Absolutely pathetic. Somebody should resign over this whole debacle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 10 minutes ago, Lee Sinnott2 said: Absolutely pathetic. Somebody should resign over this whole debacle... If only it were the owner and his brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowenicki Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 2 hours ago, BP1960 said: If only it were the owner and his brother. I think this buck stops at Karl doesn’t it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 5 hours ago, Magic Mikey said: Is that the incline from the RRE to the Chaddy? No, the other way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 1 hour ago, kowenicki said: I think this buck stops at Karl doesn’t it? Must admit, that's what I was thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, the_mighty_bosh said: Must admit, that's what I was thinking. Depends who has sanctioned and signed off the transfer but their are 3 likely culprits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 7 hours ago, Lee Sinnott2 said: Absolutely pathetic. Somebody should resign over this whole debacle... They shouldn't resign they should be shown he door. Then again it may be Mo's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mick26 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 19 hours ago, the_mighty_bosh said: An "unfortunate misinterpretation". Incompetence is a better way to describe it. "Lemsagamy" Snicket's - "A Series of Unfortunate Events". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 On 8/18/2021 at 12:22 AM, Barryowen said: The club statement represents negligence and mal-administration. Simple fact. The EFL Regulations can be complex but the one on embargo is a simple read. Even if you don’t understand it there is a Governance Department and a Solicitor at the EFL who can advise. In my opinion, the player still has his contract because the EFL regulation does not revoke it. We are told the club are supporting the player. Of course they are, he will be getting his wages in accordance with its terms. The “system” is simple. You don’t misunderstand interpretations with contracts which is costly if you get it wrong. The club solicitors was often the back stop when checking contracts before being finalised. I would be interested if they had an input. I just have an incline they haven’t because club staff would believe they know better. I hope an agreement is reached for the boy’s sake because he does not want to get himself into a position of not towing the line. Watch this space.!!!!! Suzanne's article at the time laid it out pretty clearly. https://www.theoldhamtimes.co.uk/sport/football/19429281.transfer-embargo-limits-oldham-free-transfers-loans/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteG Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 5 minutes ago, singe said: Suzanne's article at the time laid it out pretty clearly. https://www.theoldhamtimes.co.uk/sport/football/19429281.transfer-embargo-limits-oldham-free-transfers-loans/ She does and it's clear players can only sign a 1 year contract. However, she has missed part of the embargo which states it also has a maximum of £800 per week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 3 hours ago, PeteG said: She does and it's clear players can only sign a 1 year contract. However, she has missed part of the embargo which states it also has a maximum of £800 per week. It also states that we are under this embargo for three years. Perhaps Bowden is another who can't play now as well, as his loan was for a full season. It seems obvious that when they signed up for this loan, they didn't understand the consequences. What utter morons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 39 minutes ago, al_bro said: It also states that we are under this embargo for three years. Perhaps Bowden is another who can't play now as well, as his loan was for a full season. It seems obvious that when they signed up for this loan, they didn't understand the consequences. What utter morons. there is an exemption for young players- they can have a full season loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted August 20, 2021 Author Share Posted August 20, 2021 Added Faysal Bettache. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted August 24, 2021 Author Share Posted August 24, 2021 On 8/17/2021 at 2:42 PM, bigfatjoe1 said: Unless Blyth leaves? How short term is his short-term contract? What happened with the lad from Wolves? Does anyone know? Going to Aberdeen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.